Friday, October 28, 2011

Do you think that there should be a cure for HIV/AIDS

Do you think that there should be a cure for HIV/AIDS?
Do you think that with todays technology and medical advancements, that we have come far enough to have developed a cure for HIV/AIDS if we had wanted to? If we had worked hard towards it?
STDs - 3 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Well, it would be great to find a cure. But just like cancer, it's very complicated and can only be treated.
2 :
Of course not. Do you really think that the thousands of scientist trying vigorously and tirelessly to combat this horrible virus aren't trying as hard as they can to do so? Viruses are much harder to treat than lets say diseases caused by bacteria.
3 :
people with AIDS/HIV kind of deserve it... they shouldnt be engauging in unprotected sex, and risky behivior
4 :
there is a cure. its just not open to the general public. its only for the extremely rich and powerful. population control



Read more discussions :

Monday, October 24, 2011

Can someone break down for me in laymen terms how the HIV/AIDS T-cell counts works

Can someone break down for me in laymen terms how the HIV/AIDS T-cell counts works?
I have friend who is newly diagnosed and trying to support them with doctors' appointments. She is getting her t-cell counts but can't make heads or tails of it.
Infectious Diseases - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
It is just a count of the number of CD4+ T-cells per cubic mm of circulating blood. CD4+ are the type of white blood cell that HIV infects and kills, and they are also the type that is a crucial link in immune response against viral infections (with viral infections, the CD4+'s job is to alert the killer T-cells, called CD8+, to the presence of infected cells). In addition, CD4+ help in the direct killing of bacterial and fungal infections. Therefore, poor CD4+ counts make it increasingly difficult for the body to fight off infections that people with normal immune systems would essentially never get (these infections are called AIDS-defining illnesses) and low counts also make it difficult (in fact, probably impossible) for the body to get rid of HIV. What makes HIV an unusual virus is that it specifically targets a link in the immune system. Generally the definition of AIDS involves a CD4+ count of less than 200 cells/mm3 alone or in combination with an AIDS-defining illness (thrush, PCP pneumonia, Cryptococcal pneumonia, Kaposis sarcoma are the most well known of these). In Westernized countries, full blown AIDS can usually be warded off indefinitely, though, with good adherence to the prescribed antiviral meds (which are frequently not begun until CD4+ drop below 400/mm3, as far as I know). If your friend can do a good job with her meds, she will likely be fine for a long time and there's a very good chance that she'll live a pretty normal life, actually. Best of luck to you and her.
2 :
HIV kills T cells called CD4 cells, which help us fight infection. Low CD4 cell counts cause people to become vulnerable to all other infections, any of which can kill someone whose immune system is severely damaged. Once the CD4 count drops to 200 or below, diagnosis changes to AIDS. According to a specialist I work with, treatment is usually started when the CD4 count drops to 350 or below. Your friend should ask her doctor to explain her test results so that she can understand them.



Read more discussions :

Thursday, October 20, 2011

What are four ways HIV/AIDs can be prevented

What are four ways HIV/AIDs can be prevented?
Name four ways HIV/AIDs can be prevented, its for a school project any answers will be greatly appreciated
STDs - 2 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
I would have thought the following 5 would help (you can narrow it down to 4):- 1) Abstinence 2) Use of condoms 3) Avoiding breast-feeding of infants with HIV +ve mothers 4) Screening blood donors 5) Avoiding unnecessary blood products (and surgical procedures)
2 :
1) Sexual abstinence 2) Using protection (condoms) for sex 3) Checking people before donating blood 4) If a mother has HIV/AIDS she should not breast feed 5) Use clean needles for shots, so blood is not tranferred



Read more discussions :

Sunday, October 16, 2011

do you think discrimonation agaisnt people living with HIV/AIDS should be addressed as a human rights issue

do you think discrimonation agaisnt people living with HIV/AIDS should be addressed as a human rights issue?
this has come as a concern that employers continue to use HIV as a precondition for hiring staff in the military,the police,banks and some families test their maids,churches are also discriminating HIV-positive people demanding for screening before wedding couples.is this really right?
Law & Ethics - 4 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Yes. There are positions that you would not want someone with HIV/AIDS in for health reasons.
2 :
i don't think it.. it is humiliating for them... i mean to go to some crountries (the USA, Russia, China...) for visa purpose you have to give a HIV test... it's unfair... but i understand that some people are afraid about having a doctor with this desease... so i don't know... but i know that saying yes to this answer without any distinction show the stupidity of the guys
3 :
I believe this is an act of discrimination. It would be the same as if you would discrimate against a person who has handicaps or a race or religion. I don't think this is a right to do so. It's disgusting.
4 :
well then all forms of discrimination are human rights issues..which basically i feel they are. it matters not if its health, race, sex or any other matter... it's still discrimination so why single HIV/AIDS out alone? Just a side note here... many countries force couples to have blood test for many things (not just HIV) before they marry as their are recessive gene disorders and countries screen in order to prevent a possible future burden on the health system. If they found someone had cancer they wouldn't let them in the country either. It's all down to dollars and biggitory I'm sad to say. Many people don't seem to care until it's in their own house I'm afraid at least that's how I see it.




Read more discussions :

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

How long will it take for a person to develop HIV/ AIDS after they have been infected

How long will it take for a person to develop HIV/ AIDS after they have been infected?

Infectious Diseases - 5 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
Sorry to say, but it can take many years, up to 10
2 :
Yeah, I agree with the other person up there. You're first infected with HIV [always. no question. =_=], which is when your immune system totally collapses. Since your immune system is practically useless after that, ANY kind of sickness you contract thereafter is considered fatal, because you have no immune system to counteract it. Yup, that's AIDS - even if you get something as simple as a cold, you can die from it. So really, it's only a matter of time. You can't say how long it's going to be - sorry about that ><
3 :
I worked in an AIDS/HIV facility. Many of my clients had it for 20 yrs. By that time they looked like death warmed over. Very tragic to see these once beautiful faces all sunken and wasting away. What a horrible disease.
4 :
usually after infection it can take 3-6 months before HIV antibodies will show up on a serology blood test. As for symptoms, you may have HIV for years and not know it. If HIV turns into full blown AIDS then there are many symptoms. A person with HIV doesnt necessarily end up with AIDS or can live with HIV for a long time before it can turn into AIDS. If you think you are at risk, request a HIV serology (blood) test 3 months after you think you were infected and then 6 months from initial supposed infection. HIV is extremely hard to contract just too put your mind at ease. If HIV is caught early it can be managed and you can live a normal life within reason and limits (obviously dont share drugs, share razors or have unprotected sex) I have also worked with HIV/AIDS patients. It breaks your heart. You also must realise that there is alot of misunderstandings about the disease. It is not necessarily a death sentence in the 21st century. In the 80's it was, but not now! hope that answered your question.
5 :
it is very hard to tell how long it will take. with every person it is different. i myself have been HIV PPS. for twenty years. my late wife passed away twelve years ago. my viral load is below 50. my CD4 is 787. i believe stay fit . talk to your doctor about any concerns.



Read more discussions :

Saturday, October 8, 2011

What do you think about individuals with HIV/AIDS who try to justify being sexually active

What do you think about individuals with HIV/AIDS who try to justify being sexually active?
I hear it time and again..."Its part of my 'quality of life' and I have the right to have sex if I use precautions." I think these 'precautions' they are reffering to are not always fool proof and they are putting people at risk. It just seems to me like having sex for your 'quality of life' should be the last thing on your mind when you are dealing with something that is going to kill you and possibly kill other people! Isn't it saving a lot of grief and pain if they just jerk off? Miata...do you have AIDS. Is that what this is all about? If not...then go ahead, have sex with one of your friends for 20-some years and contract it because, oh, whats the harm!! Having AIDS is like having the cold virus, huh? Its people like you who I actually think PROMOTE STD'S. Your a jerk.
STDs - 11 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/TheOpenDoorForsupport/
2 :
Well the other person involved is taking the risk by having sex with them in the first place.
3 :
i think if the person they are sexually active with is AWARE of their disease and consents than who are we to criticize?
4 :
As long as they tell people what they have, I am ok with it. I do not think I could do anything, I am not infected. I am assuming they cleared with their doctor. I have a feeling that we will reach the point ( we may already be there) where HIV infected people will be like Herpes infected are today. The virus will be controlled and you will see boards of HIV infected people trying to meet other infected to hook up.
5 :
There are so many people with std's these days, and you see those commercials that a huge percent of people with HIV don't even know they have it. This is so ridiculous that myself, a sexually inactive person has to worry about getting HIV. (I know its harder to get without having sex, but it is possible.) People who don't protect themselves and get tested are getting everyone else. I think it should be mandatory to get tested every couple years otherwise I fear the numbers with std's will be out of control as they are nearing already.
6 :
If they are up front with their soon to be sex partner about their disease, then i think its between both of them honestly
7 :
in my opnion you do not have to make sex from the base befor to make sex you and you freind havt to go to the doctor to check up befor to make sex this is my advice
8 :
Well if thats the case you should also be including those with herpes since it never goes away. I think as long as the person is honest with their partner and they take the right precautions there shouldn't be any cause for alarm.
9 :
HIV/AIDS positive individual can be prosecuted criminally for engaging in sexual activity without the knowledge of their sexual partner. However if someone voluntarily has intercourse with them while knowing beforehand i have nothing to say about that except that is a totally stupid idea. If someone with hiv/aids wants to have sex they probably should find a support group and meet someone their who also has problems and not selfishly coerce innocent individuals into emotional entanglement so they can prey upon them. they should go rub off a batch and try to reflect upon their life and not be so shallow.
10 :
Why shouldn't people with HIV/AIDS be allowed to have sex? As long as they're up front about it and the other person knows the risks and decides to sleep with them, who the hell is to tell them that's wrong? Yes, a large percentage of the people that have AIDS don't know they have it.. but if you're going to sleep with someone with out using protection when you first meet them.. then you're just as bad. You're taking a risk everytime, too. You get what you deserve.
11 :
You Said: "dealing with something that is going to kill you and possibly kill other people!" You might be very mistaken.. ( this does not mean one should not disclose or have unsafe sex). There are a huge # of HIV positives that are not dieing or getting sick from just registering antibodies on a HIV test. These tests do not test for nor detect actual virus of any sort. Please remember that. This is the way it is and always has been. These people who take care of themselves and never consume highly toxic drugs pushed by the AIDS establishment, will have a normal life expectancy. I know more than just a few of these people personally for more than 20 years now! When you couple these facts with the following scientific study that says HIV is NOT SEXUALY TRANSMITTED... one can only make the sensible and logical conclusion that we are not dealing with a virus that causes disease and death! The "Padian Study" was the longest and largest epidemiological study of heterosexual tranmission of HIV (1986-1996); -For 10 years, it followed 175 discordant couples, who had a lotta sex. "Discordant" means for each couple, 1 person was HIV+, and one was not. -After 10 years, the scientists found NO seroconversions. -The couples who used condoms, did not transmit the virus -The couples who failed to use condoms, did not transmit the virus -The couples that exclusively engaged in vaginal intercourse did not transmit the virus; -In fact, 39% of the couple engaged in anal sex -- they too did not transmit the virus. This is the study: Padian NS, Shiboski SC, Glass SO, Vittinghoff E. Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in northern California: results from a ten-year study. American Journal of Epidemiology 1997;146:350-357. -So, if you're gonna have sex with an HIV+ person, "You're gonna get the virus, get AIDS and die," is a VERY STUPID AND FALSE ASSUMPTION



Read more discussions :

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Do you think there the cure for HIV/AIDS is being hidden

Do you think there the cure for HIV/AIDS is being hidden?
The medical industry makes billions in revenue from all the treatment they provide to people with the disease and all the doctors and other higher ups get big fat paychecks. A cure would ultimately defeat that purpose, effectively ending their limitless income. That's the theory. Do you agree or disagree with it?
Medicine - 14 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
i agree the u.s has alot of secrets and its taking all of us into debt well eventually
2 :
It's way more likely the cure for stupidity is being hidden. How could you keep a secret that big hidden? -Also, if a cure was out there, unprotected sex would NOT be an issue and people would have AIDS like they now have Herpes EXCEPT they'd be able to get "fixed" and continue having unprotected sex. They'd actually make more money in giving a cure. I mean, how can you charge someone for medical treatment if they're dead?
3 :
That is SAD!!!!!!!!!!! I don't think so, only because you know 1 or 2 doctors would have a heart.... and could potentially mess up the whole scheme of things... unless only 1 or 2 knew about the cure... but what would be the point of having made the cure?
4 :
YES, for the reasons you just explained.
5 :
That is very interesting indeed. I disagree. I believe if there is a cure for AIDS it won't affect their income. People will still get AIDS and they will still make money curing them with the cure. Once a cure is found for AIDS it will take decades before the strain is depleted.
6 :
Disagree. As you stated, they make quite a lot of money because the treatment is SO expensive (Like 15000$ a year while producing it costs 350$). But being so expensive not many people use it. The cure would still cost a lot of money and would be bought by MUCH more governments and people. And finally there's the ethical factor, I know lots of drug companies lack it, but being the one that discovers the cure of AIDS would gain unending fame and quite an income not to release it for more money.
7 :
I tend to disagree... I think the rationale is there, but I also have confidence in the decency of human nature and professional integrity of medical practitioners. Moreover, I think the same reasoning can be applied to the treatment of any other malady, yet effective remedies and/or innoculations are marketed in those cases -- polio, for example.
8 :
I think there has been a cure for HIV and AIDS for over a decade. But our wonderful government has repressed it. Because of that BILLION dollar figure that you mentioned
9 :
there is no way a drug company is going to silence a cure for anything,period.they are publicly owned and a "cure" for anything makes the stock rise
10 :
a real cure needs allot of scientists working on it. if a cure was found, allot of people would know it. it would be a merely impossible act, to silence all the people. btw: a company with the cure could take anything for it, plus the p.r.-effect would be so immense, that it would be more profitable to release the new drug, than to hide it. i don't think that a cure would be hhidden.
11 :
Interesting. I disagree with this idea, which had been going around a lot recently. As someone else said, how could anyone keep something that big hidden?
12 :
I Agree.The cure has been found, sure it's found in the Amazon Rainforest. Fat paychecks should go to the indigenous people of the Rainforest Tribes.
13 :
Sorry, but that makes little sense. First off, medical breakthroughs are published in publicly available periodicals. Secondly, there are scientists working for multiple countries and many companies trying to find the cure. Only a few companies produce the AIDS treatments, so other companies have a strong competitive reason to try and make money by finding and selling a cure. If you did a little research on how the AIDS virus works, and just how quickly it mutates, you would understand why it is such a difficult virus to stop. We don't even have cures for the Common cold or the Flu, and new strains come out every year. I would gladly pay for a cure, every time I got the Flu or a cold.
14 :
Yes. There was a famous actor that went to France. He was to return for followups but did not. He died. I have had friends in the early years that got it and were dead in 6 months. They have a cure. You have a few million?



Read more discussions :

Saturday, October 1, 2011

How does pediatric HIV/AIDS differ from adult HIV/AIDS

How does pediatric HIV/AIDS differ from adult HIV/AIDS?
I believe it manifests differently, but I am having trouble finding information about it.
STDs - 1 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
U said it manifests different, indeed it is. but in essence, i think they're the same: HIV is a kind of virus which attacks your T cells and make your immuse system workless. i knew a teenager on positivesingles.com, he is only 13yrs old, but he just inherited the virus from his mother, but he symptons he has are just the same with his mothers. and does this prove my opinion?



Read more discussions :