why would a cure for hiv/aids be good or bad?
How would a cure for hiv/aids effect the uganda population? good or bad?
STDs - 22 Answers
Random Answers, Critics, Comments, Opinions :
1 :
what?
2 :
a cure would be good
3 :
good
4 :
Good
5 :
How would a cure for a disease ever be bad?
6 :
Bad - bigger population. Good - People don't suffer
7 :
mabey you like the hiv's company
8 :
it wou;ld be good in fact a man well two made a cure and the police arrested them why?? because they dont want people getting cured the scienctist mad e this diesaeas to kill off black peolple i know tm info
9 :
For the humanity it would be good. But then again we would have all these extra mouths to feed. That means more starvation.
10 :
Without aids, how else are we supposed to keep the black race in line?
11 :
it COULD be possbily bad because then they're population would increase dramatically, creating even more of a poor country than it already is. They would then need more aid and supplies from other countries who, in the current economy, would not have the support to give them. There's probably more good than bad reasons..so I wanted to give you a bad one
12 :
what?!?! thousand die in Africa daily because of it what kind of question is that?
13 :
it is a deseade that ,will never be able to be cured ? so people stop having sex and being herion addicts . stupid man having sex with an Ape honestly ?. so it would be nice but the population will be fineish ? for now
14 :
do you not know how many people have aids??? and how many people die and how many people get aids a year?? lots and lots and lots...... if there was a cure you know how many people would be living and stuff.... theres good and bad because there would be an even more overpopulated world but still i think it would be way better that there was a cure!!!
15 :
The population would suddenly rise very fast and the whole world would die from starvation, or there would be another war. That's the extreme side to it. If the cure is made accesible for everyone. But when there is a cure people might even fight to attain that cure. And maybe the west will make poor people pay a hell of a lot. Sometimes nature needs to do its part. People have to die, we are too many on this earth. I say we just limit our offspring and educate the third world countries while we at the same time limit our energy consumptions by biking to work and school rather than drive. The people who are fit enough for the task will survive, the other will get selected as outcasts, its nature at its best. Darwinistic evolution. Survival of the fittest. Go nature, down with human drugs :D
16 :
i think they have a cure but i also think that the reason why they wont exploit it out to the world cause soooo many kids now-a-days are having sex like its candy. for instance now theres like 9 yr olds (believe or not) losing their V's. thats horrible. im no saint but cmon at such a yung age? also its just like some stds out there. kids think since they have a cure for it - it doesnt bother them as much if they do end up getin an std cus theyll say " ehhh they have a cure so who cares" they wont value them selfs as much as some or most do now when it comes to thinking twice on who u sleep with. also ppl are afraid of over population. so its all in abuse of having a cure that later on if they do have one ppl wont take it as serious as they are now. cmon the technology we have these days i think anything is possible. thats just my opinion though
17 :
There is already a cure for it. It's only for the wealthy.. ie:magic johnson any normal person with hiv would of been dead or really really close to it. So it's all bull really. There is a cure.. if they were to leak it out they would have to find ways to serve everyone who cant afford it and then they would end up losing money. They don't want to share with the small people. It would cost too much to mass produce it for people who cant even afford it. Therefore a cure would be bad because they would keep it under wraps and everyone would be lied to. Imagine how many people would fuss over it?? riots and i'm sure it would resort to killing people. so it's bad to have it and have it hidden. Plus imagine how many people would run amuck knowing that they can do what ever they want with out any risks because they would get treated after? It wont be taken seriously, and more and more people would become affected. THen we would run out of the resources that is needed to be in the cure all. Bad idea.. leave as is.
18 :
It would cause a dramatic rise in juvenile pregnancies (as happened when cures for things like syphilis became generally available). Fear is the only thing that keeps at least a lot of people from banging every bit of meat that crosses their way. As such a lack of a cure probably also prevents a lot of people from fooling around outside their marriages, something that is extremely traumatic for the kids. And in Africa AIDS acts as a major means to keep the population down, preventing wars, famine, and a mass influx of refugees to Europe and Asia. By wiping out stupid people who do bang everything of the other sex (and sometimes same sex) it also helps increase the intelligence of the human race. It also reduces the number of slaves available to Arab slavetraders (and the market demand for African slaves in Arab countries). Last but not least it may prevent some people from turning into rapists. So overall it's a good thing there's no cure for it.
19 :
well how the fuck would it be a bad idea?? No offence but it's kind of a no brainer
20 :
Honestly it would be good for the people that have HIV for a cure to be invented. However disease is natures way of killing people off. Population control, it has always been and will always be its sad people have to die but without death really what kind of lives would we lead? Think about it.
21 :
It would be nothing but good. Insanity saying that AIDS is tolerable as a means of population control! Perhaps those who are proponents of the slow death of people in poverty-stricken nations should do the charitable thing and off themselves, thus ridding the world of its burden of surplus population. The best way to prevent overpopulation is not to sit back and let people die, but improve education and provide effective birth control. When a country's economic status improves, birth rates fall. The result is a higher standard of living for the people and less overpopulation. Sub-Saharan Africa has difficulty increasing education and incomes partially because of AIDS, which has ravaged the population, killing those in their prime. Successfully treat or prevent HIV infections and standards of living will eventually rise.
22 :
Cass if you actually did your research you would not have made the unfounded comment about sex with an ape, as the HIV virus is suspected from coming from the Green monkey not an ape and is about the size of an average house cat, therefore it was not from sex with the animal, but rather because the animal was used as a source of food and the virus spread during the cleaning or butchering of the animal when the man cut himself. Any cure would be good, but also bad because it would create a situation that would promote carelessness and increased spreading of the disease until everyone has either been cured or vaccinated for HIV.
Read more discussions :
